looivy
12-22 12:45 PM
could this be true?
Repubs are the only one from whom we can expect support for legals.
Dems didn't do sh%$ in first two years when they had majority in all chambers and now they are trying to make repubs look bad.
Repubs are the only one from whom we can expect support for legals.
Dems didn't do sh%$ in first two years when they had majority in all chambers and now they are trying to make repubs look bad.
wallpaper Rapper Nate Dogg is Dead at 41
veni001
12-23 03:11 PM
Why so quiet today?
Where is the holiday spirit?
Not even any joke?
Holiday "spirit" is in the bottle and that is what every one is enjoying during this holiday season:D
Where is the holiday spirit?
Not even any joke?
Holiday "spirit" is in the bottle and that is what every one is enjoying during this holiday season:D
eb3India
12-07 07:56 AM
Did we ever think about forming a team with other like minded people under one banner? I think we will be able to effect something if all Pro CIR people join hands together and pool our resources. Any suggestions??
Good idea! here is why it won't work
AILA sees 11 milllion clients at their door step, so they support more of CIR which mostly favours illegals
Compete America is more towards corporate interest, they will be happy if they get more H1Bs, they do support more EB green cards, but I don't think itz their top agenda
IV is formed by guys who are really victims, so we know whatz in our best intrest, none of other groups are not victims they just want to take advantage of current situation
never the less their policy do align with ours , so I am sure IV core members are in touch with these organization and work them more closly
Good idea! here is why it won't work
AILA sees 11 milllion clients at their door step, so they support more of CIR which mostly favours illegals
Compete America is more towards corporate interest, they will be happy if they get more H1Bs, they do support more EB green cards, but I don't think itz their top agenda
IV is formed by guys who are really victims, so we know whatz in our best intrest, none of other groups are not victims they just want to take advantage of current situation
never the less their policy do align with ours , so I am sure IV core members are in touch with these organization and work them more closly
2011 While the cause of Nate Dogg#39;s
theshiningsun
07-31 04:11 AM
hi attorneys,
which visa can someone apply for it s/he intends to work as a caterer?
is the J-1 visa applicable for this? if yes what r the eligibility requirements for this visa?
thx in advance,
which visa can someone apply for it s/he intends to work as a caterer?
is the J-1 visa applicable for this? if yes what r the eligibility requirements for this visa?
thx in advance,
more...
martinvisalaw
07-28 11:06 AM
RFE is requesting information about Section 212 of Immigration and Nationality Act. How big of a trouble am I in?
That depends on whether you were subject to a 2-year home residence requirement because of being in J-1 status. If you were subject to this requirement, and didn't fulfill it or get a waiver, you need to do one or the other before you get permanent residence approved.
That depends on whether you were subject to a 2-year home residence requirement because of being in J-1 status. If you were subject to this requirement, and didn't fulfill it or get a waiver, you need to do one or the other before you get permanent residence approved.
mhtanim
02-23 09:45 PM
Any updates on this?
more...
Scythe
10-18 02:18 PM
Excellent work. Looks like that chicken spent a little too much time in the egg :grin:
2010 Nate Dogg dead at 41 years old
Karthikthiru
08-08 08:34 AM
I think attorneys would know it better
Karthik
Karthik
more...
gcadream
02-25 08:04 AM
Few friends of my whose PD were in 2003 had got their GC no matter the current opening is for Jul2001, since you have already applied for ur I-485, I think it would be better for you to wait & watch for some more time and join company B on EAD with contract to hire position.
Or else you can start ur EB2 processing also through Company B and then later I think there is a way to make us of PD of EB3 when filling for ur I485.
Or else you can start ur EB2 processing also through Company B and then later I think there is a way to make us of PD of EB3 when filling for ur I485.
hair Singer Nate Dogg, known for
prem_goel
07-02 10:40 PM
Yes it seems USCIS is also asking the public to help improve its website. It has posted a link on its homepage "Help improve uscis.gov" which was supposed to take you to another page. Unfortunately that link is broken as of now. If you click on it, it takes you to a blank page.
I would say, for starters, how about posting links that actually work????
I would say, for starters, how about posting links that actually work????
more...
Meghna
06-24 08:38 PM
good find ...
hot R.I.P NATE DOGG
GotGC??
02-28 03:39 PM
It is not an issue for people of Indian origin who are returning, of planning to return, back to India for whatever reason. They are the lucky (?) ones to have either a Indian passport or PIO card or OCI card so they are eligible to work on that basis.
But how about those who do not qualify for one of the above? There is an increasing number of foreigners working in India - how do they become eligible to work in India? Is there an equivalent of an H1B, or may be oneday GC & Citizenship?
But how about those who do not qualify for one of the above? There is an increasing number of foreigners working in India - how do they become eligible to work in India? Is there an equivalent of an H1B, or may be oneday GC & Citizenship?
more...
house longtime friend Nate Dogg,
vidyas_m
04-27 10:50 AM
Thank you for the positive info, QuintonBermuda.
tattoo Nate Dogg
JobSeekerInUSonL2withEAD
12-14 06:50 PM
In my job search (banking and finance jobs) there is this one question i come across on each and every job application-
"Do you now or will you in the future require sponsorship to legally work in the united states?"
and options to tick on the form are 'yes' or 'no' with no space for explanation.
So i mark 'yes' and i guess thats where my job applications get stuck.
Should I answer yes or no, since i am on L2 (visa valid for next 2 years) and currently have 2 years Employment Authorisation (EAD) where i can work for any employer in the United States ?
I understand that companies ask this question because some of them are not allowed/ do not have a policy to sponsor visas.
I want to know whether i am legally required to say 'yes' beacuse i am on L2 ( since after 2 years, my visa renewal depends on whether or not my spouse's L1 is renewed)
OR
Do I still have a choice to say 'no' since my visa renewal gets done if my husband's gets done or i manage it on my own through a consultant... and the company i will join in both cases does not have to sponsor or pay for my visa either now or in the future.
I do not want to misrepresent any information and get thrown out of the organisation after i join, nor do I want to lose out on opportunities because of answering this question wrongly.
(There is a separate question that asks if i am legally allowed to work in the US and i answer 'yes' to that since i have an EAD)
Let me know please, it'll help a lot.
"Do you now or will you in the future require sponsorship to legally work in the united states?"
and options to tick on the form are 'yes' or 'no' with no space for explanation.
So i mark 'yes' and i guess thats where my job applications get stuck.
Should I answer yes or no, since i am on L2 (visa valid for next 2 years) and currently have 2 years Employment Authorisation (EAD) where i can work for any employer in the United States ?
I understand that companies ask this question because some of them are not allowed/ do not have a policy to sponsor visas.
I want to know whether i am legally required to say 'yes' beacuse i am on L2 ( since after 2 years, my visa renewal depends on whether or not my spouse's L1 is renewed)
OR
Do I still have a choice to say 'no' since my visa renewal gets done if my husband's gets done or i manage it on my own through a consultant... and the company i will join in both cases does not have to sponsor or pay for my visa either now or in the future.
I do not want to misrepresent any information and get thrown out of the organisation after i join, nor do I want to lose out on opportunities because of answering this question wrongly.
(There is a separate question that asks if i am legally allowed to work in the US and i answer 'yes' to that since i have an EAD)
Let me know please, it'll help a lot.
more...
pictures RIP: Nate Dogg Dead At 41
gchopes
06-02 05:50 PM
Thanks for your responses. Will the 240 day rule apply even if I reentered on AP and in parolee status?
dresses death of rapper Nate Dogg
vhd999
02-16 07:28 PM
We have been applying for advance parole document at NSC for the last few years.
This time also we sent our application to NSC on 01/28/2010.
However, after about 15 days, we received a receipt notice letter from Vermont service center and the case is now pending at VSC. Moreover, the check is not cashed yet.
Based on the state we are living, the I-131 application instructions specify that I-140 based applications should be sent to Nebraska service center.
I am wondering if USCIS started processing I-131 applications at VSC.
Or our application is mistakenly misclassified and sent to VSC.
Any comments?
This time also we sent our application to NSC on 01/28/2010.
However, after about 15 days, we received a receipt notice letter from Vermont service center and the case is now pending at VSC. Moreover, the check is not cashed yet.
Based on the state we are living, the I-131 application instructions specify that I-140 based applications should be sent to Nebraska service center.
I am wondering if USCIS started processing I-131 applications at VSC.
Or our application is mistakenly misclassified and sent to VSC.
Any comments?
more...
makeup better known as Nate Dogg,
abhijitp
02-11 10:37 AM
Thanks wandmaker and solaris27!
girlfriend Nate Dogg Dead At The Age Of
fcres
01-15 01:41 PM
Is it possible to use spouse's PD ?
Just to make sure i understand this CFR right Sec. 45. 2 Priority date of applicants. (http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVAP.jsp?dockey=c4934c1786b99f1896b1c58f5df66 d79)
Just to make sure i understand this CFR right Sec. 45. 2 Priority date of applicants. (http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVAP.jsp?dockey=c4934c1786b99f1896b1c58f5df66 d79)
hairstyles news about nate Dogg#39;s death
Anna35
09-18 03:08 PM
^^^^
Ann Ruben
08-05 01:53 PM
1. The short answer is: Yes, you can most likely accept a one year intra-company transfer to India, and then transfer back to a position in the US with Company B without necessarily lengthening your GC process.
2. BUT, in order to file for AOS based on the existing approved LC/I-140 (EB2 or EB3??), you would have to return to the US to work in the same position at the same location for which the underlying LC was approved.
3. Alternatively, if your position in India meets the USCIS definition of managerial or executive, and you transfer back to the US to take on a position that also qualifies as managerial or executive, Compny B could file an EB1 I-140 on your behalf (maintaining the priority date of the prior I-140), thus substantially shortening or eliminating the quota wait.
4. If you cannot qualify in the EB1 category, and Company B transfers you back to a new position or new location in the US. You can retain your original priority date, but the company will have to apply for a new PERM LC and then file a new I-140 for you.
[NOTE: The above analysis assumes you (and your spouse, if any) were born in India and subject to the immigrant visa quota for India.]
2. BUT, in order to file for AOS based on the existing approved LC/I-140 (EB2 or EB3??), you would have to return to the US to work in the same position at the same location for which the underlying LC was approved.
3. Alternatively, if your position in India meets the USCIS definition of managerial or executive, and you transfer back to the US to take on a position that also qualifies as managerial or executive, Compny B could file an EB1 I-140 on your behalf (maintaining the priority date of the prior I-140), thus substantially shortening or eliminating the quota wait.
4. If you cannot qualify in the EB1 category, and Company B transfers you back to a new position or new location in the US. You can retain your original priority date, but the company will have to apply for a new PERM LC and then file a new I-140 for you.
[NOTE: The above analysis assumes you (and your spouse, if any) were born in India and subject to the immigrant visa quota for India.]
eilsoe
10-17 11:13 AM
Hehe, no problem :P
There are many ways of achieving stuff in Photoshop.. :)
There are many ways of achieving stuff in Photoshop.. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment